Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Usha Kumari Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Usha Kumari vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974555

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Usha Kumari

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.705 of 2012 usha kumari, d/o shri satyadeo singh, r/o village- choudhary patti (tarwara), p.s.-tarwara, p.s.- g.b.nagar, district-siwan. petitioner. versus 1. the state of bihar.2. the principal secretary, human resources development department, bihar, patna.3. the director, human resources development department, bihar, patna.4. the bihar staff selection commission, bihar, patna. respondents. ---------------------------------”12. 01.2012 the grievance of the petitioner is that his certificates are being utilized by other candidates also for getting their cases considered by the bihar staff selection commission for their appointment as trained assistant teachers. learned counsel for the commission has rightly pointed out that, in terms of the order dated 13.10.2011 passed by the honble supreme court in contempt petition (c) no.297 of 2007, no court shall entertain any other objection or application with regard to seniority list and roster etc. in the circumstances, this court cannot entertain the writ application on merits. the remedy of the petitioner lies either before the commission or before the honble supreme court. the writ application is dismissed. arvind/ ( j.n. singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.705 of 2012 USHA KUMARI, D/O SHRI SATYADEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- CHOUDHARY PATTI (TARWARA), P.S.-TARWARA, P.S.- G.B.NAGAR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA.

3. THE DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA.

4. THE BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, BIHAR, PATNA. RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------”

12. 01.2012 The grievance of the petitioner is that his certificates are being utilized by other candidates also for getting their cases considered by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission for their appointment as Trained Assistant Teachers. Learned counsel for the Commission has rightly pointed out that, in terms of the order dated 13.10.2011 passed by the Honble Supreme Court in Contempt Petition (C) NO.297 of 2007, no Court shall entertain any other objection or application with regard to seniority list and roster etc. In the circumstances, this Court cannot entertain the writ application on merits. The remedy of the petitioner lies either before the Commission or before the Honble Supreme Court. The writ application is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial