Madan Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Madan Prasad vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974545
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Madan Prasad

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.11476 of 2007 madan prasad, son of rajendra prasad, resident of parau tola, p.s. lauriya, district west champaran petitioner versus 1. the state of bihar 2. the collector, bettiah 3. the s.d.o., narkatiyaganja, district west champaran respondents for the petitioner : m/s n.k.agrawal, sr. advocate and vijay anand, advocate for the state : mr. manoj kumar yadav, advocate a.c. to g.p”2. 12.01.2012 after some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to prefer statutory appeal before the competent authority. learned counsel appearing for the state does not have any objection. as a result, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. however, if there is any statutory period of limitation and if the petitioner files the memorandum of appeal along with an application for condoning the delay taking, one amongst the others, a ground that 2 he was bona fide prosecuting this writ application before this court, let the same should be considered by the concerned forum in accordance with law. it is also expected from the appellate authority that it will take steps for expeditious disposal of appeal. spd/- ( dr. ravi ranjan, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11476 of 2007 Madan Prasad, Son of Rajendra Prasad, resident of Parau Tola, P.S. Lauriya, District West Champaran Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Bettiah 3. The S.D.O., Narkatiyaganja, District West Champaran Respondents For the Petitioner : M/s N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate and Vijay Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Advocate A.C. to G.P”

2. 12.01.2012 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to prefer statutory appeal before the competent authority. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not have any objection. As a result, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. However, if there is any statutory period of limitation and if the petitioner files the memorandum of appeal along with an application for condoning the delay taking, one amongst the others, a ground that 2 he was bona fide prosecuting this writ application before this Court, let the same should be considered by the concerned forum in accordance with law. It is also expected from the appellate authority that it will take steps for expeditious disposal of appeal. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Madan Prasad vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Land Acquisition