Raj Karan Raut and anr Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Raj Karan Raut and anr vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974522

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974522
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Karan Raut and anr

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.5314 o”1. raj karan raut, son of ramshresth raut, resident of village mesaudha, p.s. piprahi, dist. sheohar.2. ram nath ram, son of ramdayal ram, resident of village piprahi, dist. sheohar. ------- petitioners versus 1. the state of bihar.2. the district magistrate, sheohar.3. the district superintendent of education, sheohar.4. the block development officer, piprahi, sheohar.5. the block education extension officer, piprahi, sheohar.6. md. jallaluddin ansari, the then mukhia, gram panchayat raj, mesaudha, piprahi block, sheohar.7. the panchayat sachiv, gram panchayat raj-mesaudha, piprahi block, sheohar.8. md. sallahuddin ansari, son of md. kamamuddin ansari, resident of village mesaudha, p.s. piprahi, sheohar.9. saurabh kumar, son of ram chandra ram, resident of village mesaudha, p.s. piprahi, sheohar. ------- respondents ------------”12. 01.2012 after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to enable the petitioners to move district teachers appellate authority for redressal of their grievance raised herein. that being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (mihir kumar jha, j.) rsh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5314 o”

1. Raj Karan Raut, Son of Ramshresth Raut, resident of Village Mesaudha, P.S. Piprahi, Dist. Sheohar.

2. Ram Nath Ram, son of Ramdayal Ram, resident of Village Piprahi, Dist. Sheohar. ------- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

3. The District Superintendent of Education, Sheohar.

4. The Block Development Officer, Piprahi, Sheohar.

5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Piprahi, Sheohar.

6. Md. Jallaluddin Ansari, the then Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Mesaudha, Piprahi Block, Sheohar.

7. The Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj-Mesaudha, Piprahi Block, Sheohar.

8. Md. Sallahuddin Ansari, son of Md. Kamamuddin Ansari, resident of Village Mesaudha, P.S. Piprahi, Sheohar.

9. Saurabh Kumar, son of Ram Chandra Ram, resident of Village Mesaudha, P.S. Piprahi, Sheohar. ------- Respondents ------------”

12. 01.2012 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to enable the petitioners to move District Teachers Appellate Authority for redressal of their grievance raised herein. That being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Rsh

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Raj Karan Raut and anr vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Education