Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr. Nikhil Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Dr. Nikhil Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974507

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. Nikhil Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.44647 of 2011 dr. nikhil kumar versus the state of bihar ----------- 02/ 12.01.2012 supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned addl. public prosecutor for the state. petitioner is in jail custody in a case registered under sections 304a, 504 of the ipc and 3(i-x) of the sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act. allegation against the petitioner is that he did not provide proper treatment to the husband of the informant and also humiliate her by calling her castes name. the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was not on duty when the deceased was admitted in the hospital and subsequently, in the next morning petitioner left hospital at 8 a.m. and after that the deceased died at 8.10 a.m. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, dr. nikhil kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, bettiah, west champaran in bettiah town p.s. case no. 569/2011. shahid (hemant kumar srivastava,j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44647 of 2011 Dr. Nikhil Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 12.01.2012 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody in a case registered under sections 304A, 504 of the IPC and 3(I-X) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Allegation against the petitioner is that he did not provide proper treatment to the husband of the informant and also humiliate her by calling her castes name. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was not on duty when the deceased was admitted in the hospital and subsequently, in the next morning petitioner left hospital at 8 a.m. and after that the deceased died at 8.10 a.m. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Dr. Nikhil Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Bettiah Town P.S. Case no. 569/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial