Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sadanand Singh and ors Vs. State of Bihar and anr

Sadanand Singh and ors vs State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974480

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sadanand Singh and ors

Respondent

State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

.....coram: honourable mr. justice rajendra kumar mishra oral order (per: honourable mr. justice rajendra kumar mishra) ------------”24. 01-2012 heard the parties. the petitioners have approached this court under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure to quash the order dated 11.6.2007 passed in complaint case no.757 of 2007 by the court of sri anil kumar, judicial magistrate, first class, banka, summoning the accused-petitioners under section 202 of the code of criminal procedure, on inquiry, finding prima facie case under sections 323 and 379 of the indian penal 2 patna high court cr.misc. no.43982 of 2008 (4) dt.24-01-2012 2/3 code against the accused-petitioners and also the order dated 16.9.2008 passed by the additional sessions judge, fast track court not iii, bhagalpur, dismissing the criminal revision no.189 of 2007, as preferred by the accused-petitioners against the aforesaid order dated 11.6.2007, affirming the summoning order dated 11.6.2007. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not present on the alleged date on the place of occurrence rather they were at kolkatta and they have been falsely implicated in this case due to dispute and grudge. perused the order dated 11.6.2007 passed by the court of sri anil kumar, judicial magistrate, first class, banka, in complaint case no.757 of 2007 and also the order dated 16.9.2008 passed by the additional sessions judge, fast track court not iii, bhagalpur, in criminal revision no.189 of 2007. there is nothing in both the orders to show the abuse of the process of the court for interference by this court in inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure. accordingly, this application stands dismissed. so far as the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners are concerned, the petitioners would be at liberty to 3 patna high court cr.misc. no.43982 of 2008 (4) dt.24-01-2012 3/3 raise.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43982 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. Sadanand Singh, son of Late Matuk Nath Singh, resident of village- Kasba, P.S. Shambhuganj, District-Banka, presently, residing at Minto Park, Government Housing Estate Flat No.42, 4 th Floor, 247/14 J.C. Bose Road, Kolkatta-27.

2. Subash Chandra Singh, son of Late Basudeo Narayan Singh, resident of village-Surkhikal, P.S. Tilakmanjhi, District-Bhagalpur, presently posted as Headmaster in Anup Devi Girls High School, Kasba, P.S. Shambhuganj, District-Banka.

3. Ranjit Kumar Das @ Ranjit Sinha, son of Arun Chandra Das, resident of village-Kasba, P.S. Shambhuganj, District-Banka. .... .... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Manju Sharma, wife of Somesh Sharma, resident of village- Kasba, P.S. Shambhuganj, District-Banka. .... .... Opposite Partyies. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh No.2, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Najmul Hoda, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA) ------------”

24. 01-2012 Heard the parties. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the order dated 11.6.2007 passed in Complaint Case No.757 of 2007 by the court of Sri Anil Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Banka, summoning the accused-petitioners under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, on inquiry, finding prima facie case under Sections 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal 2 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43982 of 2008 (4) dt.24-01-2012 2/3 Code against the accused-petitioners and also the order dated 16.9.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court not III, Bhagalpur, dismissing the Criminal Revision No.189 of 2007, as preferred by the accused-petitioners against the aforesaid order dated 11.6.2007, affirming the summoning order dated 11.6.2007. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not present on the alleged date on the place of occurrence rather they were at Kolkatta and they have been falsely implicated in this case due to dispute and grudge. Perused the order dated 11.6.2007 passed by the court of Sri Anil Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Banka, in Complaint Case No.757 of 2007 and also the order dated 16.9.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court not III, Bhagalpur, in Criminal Revision No.189 of 2007. There is nothing in both the orders to show the abuse of the process of the court for interference by this Court in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. So far as the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners are concerned, the petitioners would be at liberty to 3 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43982 of 2008 (4) dt.24-01-2012 3/3 raise their defence at the appropriate stage during the course of the trial in the court below. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) P.S./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial