Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Binay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Binay Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974414

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Binay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.2256 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2256 of 2012 ====================================================== binay kumar .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”24. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the brother of husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 304(b)/34 of the indian penal code. there is general accusation of demand of dowry and torture against the entire in-laws family including the petitioner. the specific accusation is against the husband and this petitioner and considering the same others have been granted bail. considering the fact that specific accusation of taking the victim from parents house two days prior to occurrence by husband and this petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. however, let the learned court below patna high court cr.misc. no.2256 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 consider the regular bail of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order keeping in view that the thrust of accusation is against the husband in connection with chandauti p.s. case no. 289 of 2010 pending in the court of the learned c.j.m., gaya. with this observation, this application is disposed off. let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioner. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) u.k./-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2256 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2256 of 2012 ====================================================== Binay Kumar .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the brother of husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is general accusation of demand of dowry and torture against the entire in-laws family including the petitioner. The specific accusation is against the husband and this petitioner and considering the same others have been granted bail. Considering the fact that specific accusation of taking the victim from parents house two days prior to occurrence by husband and this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, let the learned court below Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2256 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 consider the regular bail of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order keeping in view that the thrust of accusation is against the husband in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 289 of 2010 pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Gaya. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioner. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) U.K./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial