Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Keshnath Singh and ors Vs. Gaya Pd. Singh and ors

Keshnath Singh and ors vs Gaya Pd. Singh and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974397

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Keshnath Singh and ors

Respondent

Gaya Pd. Singh and ors

Excerpt

.....the substitution application. the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the pairvikar of the appellant was outside the state of bihar and, therefore, the application could not be filed within the period. the learned counsel further submitted that some of the legal representatives of the deceased appellant nos.10 and 12 are already on record. so far appellant no.8(i) is concerned, he prayed that the name may be expunged as the other legal representatives are already on record. nobody appears on behalf of the respondents to oppose the prayer of the appellants. considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the explanation given in the substitution application, i am satisfied that the appellants were prevented by sufficient cause from not filing the substitution application within the period stipulated. therefore, the 2 delay in filing the substitution application is condoned, the abatement if any, is set aside. the legal representatives of the deceased appellant no.17 as mentioned in detail in paragraph 4 are substituted in place of the deceased appellant no.17. so far the legal representatives of the deceased appellant nos.10 and 12 are concerned, the details have been mentioned in paragraph 2 and 3 respectively. they are substituted in place of the deceased appellant nos.10 and 12 respectively. the name of appellant no.8(i) is expunged from the cause title of memo of appeal. it is submitted that all the legal representatives of the deceased appellant nos.10, 12 and 17 have already appeared by filing vakalatnama. thus, the substitution application stands allowed. saurabh (mungeshwar sahoo,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.527 of 1982 Keshnath Singh & Ors Versus Gaya Pd. Singh & Ors ---------------------------------- 35. 24.01.2012. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants on I.A. No.8402 of 2011. Since there was some delay in filing the substitution application regarding the legal representatives of deceased appellant no.17, prayer for condoning the delay and setting aside abatement has also been made in the substitution application. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the pairvikar of the appellant was outside the State of Bihar and, therefore, the application could not be filed within the period. The learned counsel further submitted that some of the legal representatives of the deceased appellant nos.10 and 12 are already on record. So far appellant no.8(i) is concerned, he prayed that the name may be expunged as the other legal representatives are already on record. Nobody appears on behalf of the respondents to oppose the prayer of the appellants. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the explanation given in the substitution application, I am satisfied that the appellants were prevented by sufficient cause from not filing the substitution application within the period stipulated. Therefore, the 2 delay in filing the substitution application is condoned, the abatement if any, is set aside. The legal representatives of the deceased appellant no.17 as mentioned in detail in paragraph 4 are substituted in place of the deceased appellant no.17. So far the legal representatives of the deceased appellant nos.10 and 12 are concerned, the details have been mentioned in paragraph 2 and 3 respectively. They are substituted in place of the deceased appellant nos.10 and 12 respectively. The name of appellant no.8(i) is expunged from the cause title of memo of appeal. It is submitted that all the legal representatives of the deceased appellant nos.10, 12 and 17 have already appeared by filing vakalatnama. Thus, the substitution application stands allowed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial