Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974388

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....of transfer of some money in his account after undue withdrawal through atm card of the informant which was taken by some one in the garb of money transaction. submission is that petitioner is also one of the sufferers and the moment came to know some money was transferred to his account and immediate withdrawal besides causing other loses. he intimated the authority and got his account non-operational. on the basis of paragraph 13, 46 and 59 of the case diary, it is pointed out that it is the informant who is not cooperating during investigation for identification of the person who is said to have helped him during transaction. investigation is still going on. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, till conclusion of investigation/submission of charge-sheet, let the above- named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of rs. patna high court cr.misc. no.41407 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, ara, bhojpur, in connection with rail ara p.s. case no. 78/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till conclusion of investigation/submission of charge-sheet, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. rajeev/- (akhilesh chandra, j.)

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41407 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41407 of 2011 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, son of Bindeshwari Prasad Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Rail Ara P.S. Case No. 78/2010 for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case on the basis of transfer of some money in his account after undue withdrawal through ATM Card of the informant which was taken by some one in the garb of money transaction. Submission is that petitioner is also one of the sufferers and the moment came to know some money was transferred to his account and immediate withdrawal besides causing other loses. He intimated the authority and got his account non-operational. On the basis of paragraph 13, 46 and 59 of the case diary, it is pointed out that it is the informant who is not cooperating during investigation for identification of the person who is said to have helped him during transaction. Investigation is still going on. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, till conclusion of investigation/submission of charge-sheet, let the above- named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41407 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur, in connection with Rail Ara P.S. Case No. 78/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till conclusion of investigation/submission of charge-sheet, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial