Amardeep Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Amardeep Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974379

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974379
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 24, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amardeep Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.906 of 2012 amardeep kumar @ akhilesh kumar versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 24.1.2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the state and smt. bela singh, learned counsel for the complainant. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.10.2011 in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 420 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that the petitioner took a friendly loan of rs.3,92,500/- but did not return. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that according to own averments of the complainant, prima facie, offence under section 420 ipc is not made out. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of j.m. ist class, vaishali in complaint case no. 1666 of 2010. anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.906 of 2012 Amardeep Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 24.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and Smt. Bela Singh, learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.10.2011 in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner took a friendly loan of Rs.3,92,500/- but did not return. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that according to own averments of the complainant, prima facie, offence under section 420 IPC is not made out. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Ist Class, Vaishali in Complaint Case No. 1666 of 2010. Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Amardeep Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education