Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ahilya Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Ahilya Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974353

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ahilya Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.2297 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2297 of 2012 ====================================================== ahilya devi .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”24. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the mother of the husband is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under sections 304(b) and 201/34 of the indian penal code. the accusation is of killing the victim for non-fulfillment of dowry demand. it is submitted that the informant has admitted in the f.i.r. that the marriage was performed nine years prior to occurrence. hence, the case does not come within the purview of section 304(b) of the i.p.c. considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with mohania p.s. patna high court cr.misc. no.2297 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 case no. 105 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned c.j.m. kaimur(bhabua), subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) u.k./-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2297 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2297 of 2012 ====================================================== Ahilya Devi .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the mother of the husband is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of killing the victim for non-fulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted that the informant has admitted in the F.I.R. that the marriage was performed nine years prior to occurrence. Hence, the case does not come within the purview of Section 304(B) of the I.P.C. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Mohania P.S. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2297 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 Case No. 105 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Kaimur(Bhabua), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) U.K./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial