Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md. Arshad Vs. the State of Bihar

Md. Arshad vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974347

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md. Arshad

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.40387 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.40387 of 2011 ====================================================== md. arshad, s/o-late khakhu .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice hemant kumar srivastava oral order (per: honourable mr. justice hemant kumar srivastava”24. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned additional public prosecutor for the state. petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears that except confessional statement of co-accused as well as some criminal antecedent, there is nothing against the petitioner. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, supaul in connection with chhatapur p.s. case no. 20 of 2011. (hemant kumar srivastava, j.) shahzad

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40387 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40387 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Arshad, S/O-Late Khakhu .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears that except confessional statement of co-accused as well as some criminal antecedent, there is nothing against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2011. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) SHAHZAD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial