Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pramila Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Pramila Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974336

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramila Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna letters patent appeal no.1989 of 2011 in civil writ jurisdiction case no. 12348 of 2011 with interlocutory application no. 8831 of 2011 in letters patent appeal no.1989 of 2011 ====================================================== pramila devi .... .... appellant/s versus the state of bihar & ors. .... .... respondent/s ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. manoj kumar, advocate. for the respondent- state: mr. a. n. sinha, g.p 1.and mr. shubhandar sharma, ac to gp 11.====================================================== coram: honourable the chief justice and honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral order (per: honourable the chief justice) 3. 24-01-2012 learned advocate mr. manoj kumar states that he shall remove the defects within one week from today. in the event, the defects are not removed within one week the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution. re. interlocutory application no. 8831 of 2011. the delay of 63 days occurred in filing the letters patent appeal is condoned. interlocutory application stands disposed of. re. letters patent appeal no. 1989 of 2011 notify for admission. (r.m. doshit, cj) prakash (birendra prasad verma, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1989 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12348 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 8831 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1989 of 2011 ====================================================== Pramila Devi .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent- State: Mr. A. N. Sinha, G.P 1.and Mr. Shubhandar Sharma, AC to GP 11.====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3. 24-01-2012 Learned Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar states that he shall remove the defects within one week from today. In the event, the defects are not removed within one week the Appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Re. Interlocutory Application No. 8831 of 2011. The delay of 63 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1989 of 2011 Notify for admission. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) Prakash (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial