Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md. Puno Vs. the State of Bihar

Md. Puno vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974303

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md. Puno

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.883 of 2012 md. puno versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 24.1.2012 learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition, as prayed for. heard mr. malay kumar choudhary, learned counsels for the petitioner, mr. pranav kumar, learned counsel for the state and learned counsel for the informant. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 4.10.2011 in a case registered under section 376 of the indian penal code. the accusation is of establishing forceful physical relationship on 26.2.2011. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accusation is ventilated through complaint after two days of the occurrence, i.e., on 28.2.2011. it appears from the complaint that no medical examination was done and statement under section 161 cr.p.c. of the victim reflects that in anticipation of the marriage the physical relationship was established. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ist additional sessions judge, 2 samastipur in tajpur (pusa) p.s. case no. 121 of 2011 (s.t. no. 615 of 2011). anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.883 of 2012 Md. Puno Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 24.1.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition, as prayed for. Heard Mr. Malay Kumar Choudhary, learned counsels for the petitioner, Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 4.10.2011 in a case registered under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of establishing forceful physical relationship on 26.2.2011. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accusation is ventilated through complaint after two days of the occurrence, i.e., on 28.2.2011. It appears from the complaint that no medical examination was done and statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. of the victim reflects that in anticipation of the marriage the physical relationship was established. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, 2 Samastipur in Tajpur (Pusa) P.S. Case no. 121 of 2011 (S.T. No. 615 of 2011). Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial