Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jaipal Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Jaipal Rai vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974298

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jaipal Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.3473 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.3473 of 2012 ====================================================== jaipal rai .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. d.n. singh, adv. for the opposite party/s : mr. ram anurag singh, app ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice aditya kumar trivedi oral order (per: honourable mr. justice aditya kumar trivedi”24. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional p.p. for the state. informant, uday narayan rai gave his fardbeyan disclosing therein that pappu kumar took away his son, manoranjan kumar. after some time, he heard sound of fire. he proceeded towards that direction and found his son in pool of blood. his younger brother, pritam narayan disclosed that as per information conveyed by pappu kumar over mobile, jaipal rai, krishna rai, rahul kumar, hemant kumar along with one unknown came over motorcycle and on an order of petitioner, jaipal rai, krishna rai and pappu kumar caught hold and rahul kumar and hemant kumar shot which proved fatal. it has been submitted that from the order impugned it is evident that the occurrence even accepting in its entirety for patna high court cr.misc. no.3473 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 the arguments sake, took place as the deceased had an access with a female member of petitioners family apart from having allegation of an order giver. taking into account the part played by the petitioner, being not an assailant, petitioner, jaipal rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, saran at chapra in connection with chapra mufassil p.s. case no. 169/2011. (aditya kumar trivedi, j.) perwez./-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3473 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3473 of 2012 ====================================================== Jaipal Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.N. Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State. Informant, Uday Narayan Rai gave his Fardbeyan disclosing therein that Pappu Kumar took away his son, Manoranjan Kumar. After some time, he heard sound of fire. He proceeded towards that direction and found his son in pool of blood. His younger brother, Pritam Narayan disclosed that as per information conveyed by Pappu Kumar over mobile, Jaipal Rai, Krishna Rai, Rahul Kumar, Hemant Kumar along with one unknown came over motorcycle and on an order of petitioner, Jaipal Rai, Krishna Rai and Pappu Kumar caught hold and Rahul Kumar and Hemant Kumar shot which proved fatal. It has been submitted that from the order impugned it is evident that the occurrence even accepting in its entirety for Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3473 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 the arguments sake, took place as the deceased had an access with a female member of petitioners family apart from having allegation of an order giver. Taking into account the part played by the petitioner, being not an assailant, petitioner, Jaipal Rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 169/2011. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) perwez./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial