Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md. Pappu Vs. the State of Bihar

Md. Pappu vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974246

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md. Pappu

Advocate Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.416 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.416 of 2012 ====================================================== md. pappu s/o md. rahim resident of mohalla- bibiganj, police station- sadar, district- muzaffarpur .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party =====================================================”24. 01-2012 the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 6.01.2010 passed in a case arising from muzaffarpur p.s. case no. 165 of 2008 (g.r.no.1825 of 2008, tr.no.827 of 2011) whereby the learned chief judicial magistrate, muzaffarpur has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 379, 120b and 414 of the indian panel code against the petitioner . mr. chandra mohan jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all the issues as raised in the present application at the stage of framing of charge. permission is allowed. this application is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. (jyoti saran, j.) bibhash

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.416 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.416 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Pappu S/O Md. Rahim resident of Mohalla- Bibiganj, Police Station- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================”

24. 01-2012 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 6.01.2010 passed in a case arising from Muzaffarpur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2008 (G.R.No.1825 of 2008, Tr.No.827 of 2011) whereby the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 379, 120B and 414 of the Indian Panel Code against the petitioner . Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all the issues as raised in the present application at the stage of framing of charge. Permission is allowed. This application is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. (Jyoti Saran, J.) Bibhash

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial