Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rampati Prasad and ors. Vs. Kailesh Prasad and ors.

Rampati Prasad and ors. vs Kailesh Prasad and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974229

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rampati Prasad and ors.

Respondent

Kailesh Prasad and ors.

Excerpt

patna high court sa no.14 of 2010 (4) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna second appeal no.14 of 2010 ====================================================== rampati prasad & ors. .... .... appellant/s versus kailesh prasad & ors. .... .... respondent/s ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. shailesh kumar for the respondent/s : mr. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice vijayendra nath oral order (per: honourable mr. justice vijayendra nath”24. 01-2012 i.a.no. 8497/11 no one appears on behalf of the appellants. this interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the appellants stating therein that the appellant nos. 3 and 4 have now attained majority and they should be permitted to pursue this appeal as majors. on the basis of the facts stated in the interlocutory application the appellant nos. 3 & 4 are accepted as majors and accordingly, the defect no.4 as pointed out by the stamp reporter is ignored. (v. nath, j.) nitesh/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court SA No.14 of 2010 (4) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.14 of 2010 ====================================================== Rampati Prasad & Ors. .... .... Appellant/s Versus Kailesh Prasad & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYENDRA NATH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYENDRA NATH”

24. 01-2012 I.A.No. 8497/11 No one appears on behalf of the appellants. This interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the appellants stating therein that the appellant nos. 3 and 4 have now attained majority and they should be permitted to pursue this appeal as majors. On the basis of the facts stated in the interlocutory application the appellant nos. 3 & 4 are accepted as majors and accordingly, the defect no.4 as pointed out by the stamp reporter is ignored. (V. Nath, J.) Nitesh/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial