Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Akasaka Electronics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Akasaka Electronics Ltd. vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jul 11, 1996
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/9742

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Akasaka Electronics Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(115)ELT817Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. duty of rs. 9.78 lakhs and penalty of rs. 1.50 lakhs has been demanded and imposed was relevant on findings in the commissioner's order that the assessee did not include in the assessable value of printed circuit boards manufactured by it the cost of tooling which had been developed for such manufacture, and suppressed such non-inclusion.2. the advocate for the applicant contends that it is not possible to establish any clear relationship between the cost of the tooling and the number of items manufactured. he relies upon the interim order of this tribunal reported in automotive axles ltd. v. c.c.e. - 1995 (79) e.l.t. 275 and the observations in an earlier decision.3. the deptartmental representative contends that these two decisions are distinguishable because in one case there had been no manufacture and in the other case the cost of tooling had been included. neither of these two decisions have been satisfied in the present case.4. the issues involved in this appeal are arguable. we do not find a prima facie case in favour of the applicant. we, therefore, order that the duty be secured by bank guarantee to be submitted before the commissioner within two months from orders. on this being done waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty is granted and its recovery stayed.

Full Judgment

1. Duty of Rs. 9.78 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 1.50 lakhs has been demanded and imposed was relevant on findings in the Commissioner's order that the assessee did not include in the assessable value of printed circuit boards manufactured by it the cost of tooling which had been developed for such manufacture, and suppressed such non-inclusion.

2. The Advocate for the applicant contends that it is not possible to establish any clear relationship between the cost of the tooling and the number of items manufactured. He relies upon the interim order of this Tribunal reported in Automotive Axles Ltd. v. C.C.E. - 1995 (79) E.L.T. 275 and the observations in an earlier decision.

3. The Deptartmental Representative contends that these two decisions are distinguishable because in one case there had been no manufacture and in the other case the cost of tooling had been included. Neither of these two decisions have been satisfied in the present case.

4. The issues involved in this appeal are arguable. We do not find a prima facie case in favour of the applicant. We, therefore, order that the duty be secured by bank guarantee to be submitted before the Commissioner within two months from orders. On this being done waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty is granted and its recovery stayed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial