Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rina Kumari and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Rina Kumari and ors vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 16, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rina Kumari and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna letters patent appeal no. 1430 of 2011 in civil writ jurisdiction case no. 7302 of 2009 with interlocutory application no. 6837 of 2011 in letters patent appeal no. 1430 of 2011. ====================================================== rina kumari & ors. .... .... appellant/s versus the state of bihar & ors. .... .... respondent/s ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mrs. soni shrivastava and mr. amit prakash, advocates. for the state : mr. v.m.k. sinha, aag 13.mr. anil kumar verma and ms. sanjana, acs to aag 13.for the respondent no. 10: mr. narendra kumar jha, advocate. for the respondent nos. 11 to 14: mr. dhirendra kumar jha-2, advocate. for the respondent nos. 15, 16 & 24: mr. sarangdhar jha, advocate. ====================================================== coram: honourable the chief justice and honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral order (per: honourable the chief justice”16. 01-2012 learned advocate mrs. soni shrivastava appears for the appellants. she states that the respondent nos. 15 to 30 were the writ petitioners in the writ petition. no relief is claimed against the respondent nos. 15 to 30; nor any relief, if granted in this appeal, would adversely affect the respondent nos. 15 to 30. she, therefore, seeks leave to delete the names of the respondent nos. 15 to 30 from the cause title. leave is granted. 2 patna high court lpa no.1430 of 2011 (7) dt.16-01-2012 2/2 the names of the respondent nos. 15 to 30 be deleted from the cause title. necessary corrections will be made in the cause title within one week from today. (r.m. doshit, cj) (birendra prasad verma, j) dilip.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No. 1430 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7302 of 2009 With Interlocutory Application No. 6837 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1430 of 2011. ====================================================== Rina Kumari & Ors. .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mrs. Soni Shrivastava and Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocates. For the State : Mr. V.M.K. Sinha, AAG 13.Mr. Anil Kumar Verma and Ms. Sanjana, ACs to AAG 13.For the Respondent no. 10: Mr. Narendra Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Respondent nos. 11 to 14: Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Jha-2, Advocate. For the Respondent nos. 15, 16 & 24: Mr. Sarangdhar Jha, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE”

16. 01-2012 Learned Advocate Mrs. Soni Shrivastava appears for the appellants. She states that the respondent nos. 15 to 30 were the writ petitioners in the writ petition. No relief is claimed against the respondent nos. 15 to 30; nor any relief, if granted in this Appeal, would adversely affect the respondent nos. 15 to 30. She, therefore, seeks leave to delete the names of the respondent nos. 15 to 30 from the cause title. Leave is granted. 2 Patna High Court LPA No.1430 of 2011 (7) dt.16-01-2012 2/2 The names of the respondent nos. 15 to 30 be deleted from the cause title. Necessary corrections will be made in the cause title within one week from today. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Dilip.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial