Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunaina Devi Vs. Raj Narayan Singh

Sunaina Devi vs Raj Narayan Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 17, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973925

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunaina Devi

Respondent

Raj Narayan Singh

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna miscellaneous appeal no.212 of 2011 ====================================================== sunaina devi .... .... appellant/s versus raj narayan singh .... .... respondent/s ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. for the respondent/s : mr. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice shiva kirti singh and honourable mr. justice aditya kumar trivedi oral order (per: honourable mr. justice shiva kirti singh”17. 01-2012 heard the parties in respect of i.a. no.1962 of 2011. for the reasons mentioned in that application under section 5 of the limitation act, the delay of six days in preferring this appeal is condoned. the i.a. is allowed. for appreciating the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant that actually no notice was served upon her in the matrimonial suit bearing divorce suit no.11 of 1998 disposed of by first additional sessions judge, vaishali at hajipur on 18th august, 1999 and that no steps were taken to procure her attendance for amicable settlement of the dispute, it is necessary to peruse the lower court records, hence call for the lower court records of divorce suit no.11 of 1998 noted above from the court concerned and also the records relating to miscellaneous case no.1 of 2000 which has been disposed of patna high court ma no.212 of 2011 (7) dt.17-01-2012 -2- on 5th january, 2011 by the principal judge, family court, vaishali at hajipur. the records are expected to reach this court within eight weeks. put up this case immediately after receipt of the records. (shiva kirti singh, j.) pn (aditya kumar trivedi, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.212 of 2011 ====================================================== Sunaina Devi .... .... Appellant/s Versus Raj Narayan Singh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH”

17. 01-2012 Heard the parties in respect of I.A. No.1962 of 2011. For the reasons mentioned in that application under Section 5 of the Limitation act, the delay of six days in preferring this appeal is condoned. The I.A. is allowed. For appreciating the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant that actually no notice was served upon her in the matrimonial suit bearing Divorce Suit No.11 of 1998 disposed of by First Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur on 18th August, 1999 and that no steps were taken to procure her attendance for amicable settlement of the dispute, it is necessary to peruse the lower court records, hence call for the lower court records of Divorce Suit No.11 of 1998 noted above from the court concerned and also the records relating to Miscellaneous Case No.1 of 2000 which has been disposed of Patna High Court MA No.212 of 2011 (7) dt.17-01-2012 -2- on 5th January, 2011 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur. The records are expected to reach this Court within eight weeks. Put up this case immediately after receipt of the records. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial