Karam Singh Vs. State and ors

Karam Singh vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Aug 01, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973843

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/973843
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On: Aug 01, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karam Singh

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

s.b. civil misc. application no.53/2012 in s.b.c.s.a. no.225/2008 karam singh vs. state of raj. & ors. decision dt:01. 08/2012 1/2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jdohpur order s.b. civil misc. application no.53/2012 in s.b. civil second appeal no.225/2008 karam singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. date of order:01. 08/2012. present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari mr. mahesh joshi on behalf of mr. suresh shrimali, for the applicant-appellant. -- 1. learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that in the judgment and order dated 10.07.2012 disposing of the sbcsa no.225/08- karam singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors., this court had given liberty to the plaintiff-appellant while dismissing his second appeal to approach before the district collector, sriganganagar to consider the objections of the plaintiff-appellant.2. he submits that the collector, hanumangarh has proper jurisdiction in the matter and, therefore, the district collector, hanumangarh instead of district collector, sriganganagar, before whom, the plaintiff may be directed to approach by representation. he, therefore, prayed that correction in para 6 of the said judgment and order dated 10.07.2012 may be made. s.b. civil misc. application no.53/2012 in s.b.c.s.a. no.225/2008 karam singh vs. state of raj. & ors. decision dt:01. 08/2012 2/2 3. the prayer seems to be just and proper. accordingly, in para 6 of the judgment and order dated 10.07.2012, the word 'district collector, sriganganagar' will be read as 'district collector, hanumangarh'. the plaintiff-appellant may approach the district collector, hanumangarh within two weeks from today.4. the misc. application is accordingly disposed of. copy of this order be sent to opposite side forthwith. (dr. vineet kothari), j.dj/- s-111

Full Judgment

S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.53/2012 in S.B.C.S.A. No.225/2008 Karam Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Decision dt:

01. 08/2012 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JDOHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.53/2012 in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.225/2008 Karam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order:

01. 08/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Mahesh Joshi on behalf of Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for the applicant-appellant. -- 1. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that in the judgment and order dated 10.07.2012 disposing of the SBCSA No.225/08- Karam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court had given liberty to the plaintiff-appellant while dismissing his second appeal to approach before the District Collector, Sriganganagar to consider the objections of the plaintiff-appellant.

2. He submits that the Collector, Hanumangarh has proper jurisdiction in the matter and, therefore, the District Collector, Hanumangarh instead of District Collector, Sriganganagar, before whom, the plaintiff may be directed to approach by representation. He, therefore, prayed that correction in para 6 of the said judgment and order dated 10.07.2012 may be made. S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.53/2012 in S.B.C.S.A. No.225/2008 Karam Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Decision dt:

01. 08/2012 2/2 3. The prayer seems to be just and proper. Accordingly, in para 6 of the judgment and order dated 10.07.2012, the word 'District Collector, Sriganganagar' will be read as 'District Collector, Hanumangarh'. The plaintiff-appellant may approach the District Collector, Hanumangarh within two weeks from today.

4. The misc. application is accordingly disposed of. Copy of this order be sent to opposite side forthwith. (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

DJ/- S-111

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2012 Same Parties Karam Singh vs State and ors Same Subject Education