Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jawed Akhtar Vs. the State of Bihar

Jawed Akhtar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 18, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973802

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jawed Akhtar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2468 of 2012 ====================================================== jawed akhtar, son of haroon miyan @ haroon rasheed, resident of village: jafar tola (bhisukwa tola), p.s. barauli, district: gopalganj. .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. ajay kumar pandey, advocate. for the opposite party/s : smt. anuradha kumari, app. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice shyam kishore sharma oral order (per: honourable mr. justice shyam kishore sharma”18. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under sections 406, 420, 467 and 474 of the indian penal code. it has been alleged that the petitioner contacted the informant and persuaded her to deposit rs. 600/- in a company that was done. others also deposited money but the amount was not given. submission is that the petitioner was doing his job in the company but later on he was selected as a teacher and so he did not remain in that job and hence the petitioner was not liable to return the money. patna high court cr.misc. no.2468 of 2012 (2) dt.18-01-2012 2 /2 considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned chief judicial magistrate/court concerned, gopalganj in connection with barauli p.s. case no. 240 of 2011. (shyam kishore sharma, j.) kksinha/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2468 of 2012 ====================================================== Jawed Akhtar, Son of Haroon Miyan @ Haroon Rasheed, Resident of Village: Jafar Tola (Bhisukwa Tola), P.S. Barauli, District: Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anuradha Kumari, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA”

18. 01-2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 474 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been alleged that the petitioner contacted the informant and persuaded her to deposit Rs. 600/- in a company that was done. Others also deposited money but the amount was not given. Submission is that the petitioner was doing his job in the company but later on he was selected as a Teacher and so he did not remain in that job and hence the petitioner was not liable to return the money. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2468 of 2012 (2) dt.18-01-2012 2 /2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Gopalganj in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 240 of 2011. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) kksinha/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial