Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Pitambar Das Rathi Vs. State and ors

Pitambar Das Rathi vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Nov 23, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973741

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pitambar Das Rathi

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

s.b. civil writ petition no. 5611/2008 (anju gurjar vs. state & ors) date of order ::21. 11.2012 hon'ble mr. justice gopal krishan vyas mr. b.s. charan, for the petitioner. mr. mukesh patodia, for the respondents. heard learned counsel for the parties. petitioner is claiming appointment on the post of rozgar sahayak in pursuance of advertisement dated 11.02.2008. in my opinion, the term for appointment on the said post has already expired, therefore, no case for interference is made out. hence, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (gopal krishan vyas), j.bjsh

Full Judgment

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5611/2008 (Anju Gurjar Vs. State & Ors) Date of Order ::

21. 11.2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. B.S. Charan, for the petitioner. Mr. Mukesh Patodia, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is claiming appointment on the post of Rozgar Sahayak in pursuance of advertisement dated 11.02.2008. In my opinion, the term for appointment on the said post has already expired, therefore, no case for interference is made out. Hence, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J.

Bjsh

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2012 Same Parties Pitambar Das Rathi vs State and ors Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales