Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jaishri Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Jaishri Singh vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 18, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973610

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jaishri Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no. 23817 of 2011 ====================================================== jaishri singh, s/o late manger singh. .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash oral order (per: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash) 04. 18.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under sections 489(b) and 489(c)/34 of the indian penal code. the petitioner was refused bail by orders dated 29.03.2010 and 01.12.2010 for being in possession of 100 notes of 500 denominations. the prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground of undue delay in trial. a report was called for from the trial court according to which seven witnesses have been examined in the case and the rest of the six witnesses have been summoned for their examination. recourse has been taken for their production through the sp concerned. in view of such, i am not inclined to review the earlier orders. the application is dismissed. (anjana prakash, j.) vikash/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23817 of 2011 ====================================================== Jaishri Singh, S/o Late Manger Singh. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 04. 18.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 489(B) and 489(C)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by orders dated 29.03.2010 and 01.12.2010 for being in possession of 100 notes of 500 denominations. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground of undue delay in trial. A report was called for from the Trial Court according to which seven witnesses have been examined in the case and the rest of the six witnesses have been summoned for their examination. Recourse has been taken for their production through the SP concerned. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier orders. The application is dismissed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Vikash/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial