Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satyendra Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Satyendra Kumar and ors vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 18, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973598

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satyendra Kumar and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna interlocutory application no. 246 of 2012 in letters patent appeal no. 1284 of 2011 in civil writ jurisdiction case no. 425 of 2011. ====================================================== satyendra kumar & ors. .... .... appellant/s versus the state of bihar & ors. .... .... respondent/s ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. arun kumar and mr. sanjay kumar sharma, advocates. for the state : mr. md. anis akhtar, ac to ga 3.for the respondent nos. 10 & 11: mr. arun kumar sinha and mr. rajan prasad, advocates. ====================================================== coram: honourable the chief justice and honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral order (per: honourable the chief justice”18. 01-2012 re. interlocutory application no. 246 of 2012. this application has been moved by the appellants for interim stay pending the appeal. learned advocate mr. arun kumar has appeared for the appellants. he concedes that the appellants services have been terminated and that none of the appellants continues in service as on today. in above view of the matter, no relief pending the appeal can be granted. at this stage learned advocate seeks leave to withdraw this application. 2 patna high court lpa no.1284 of 2011 (5) dt.18-01-2012 2/2 interlocutory application is rejected as withdrawn. (r.m. doshit, cj) (birendra prasad verma, j) dilip.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Interlocutory Application No. 246 of 2012 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1284 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 425 of 2011. ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar & Ors. .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Arun Kumar and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, AC to GA 3.For the Respondent nos. 10 & 11: Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha and Mr. Rajan Prasad, Advocates. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE”

18. 01-2012 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 246 of 2012. This application has been moved by the appellants for interim stay pending the Appeal. Learned Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar has appeared for the appellants. He concedes that the appellants services have been terminated and that none of the appellants continues in service as on today. In above view of the matter, no relief pending the Appeal can be granted. At this stage learned Advocate seeks leave to withdraw this application. 2 Patna High Court LPA No.1284 of 2011 (5) dt.18-01-2012 2/2 Interlocutory Application is rejected as withdrawn. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Dilip.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial