Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhanwar Singh Inda Vs. State and ors

Bhanwar Singh Inda vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Jul 06, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973588

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhanwar Singh Inda

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

1 s.b. civil writ petition no. 7367/2012 bhanwar singh vs. state of rajasthan and ors. date of order :6. 8.2012 hon'ble mr. govind mathur, j.mr. b.l. choudhary, for the petitioner/s. ... by the order dated 31.5.2012, the zonal manager, rajasthan state road transport corporation, jodhpur zone, jodhpur transferred the petitioner from barmer depot to jalore depot. while questioning, correctness of the same, it is stated that the petitioner is suffering from certain ailments, but without taking into consideration the same, impugned transfer has been effected. it is also pointed out that a representation was submitted by the petitioner, but the respondents did not consider the same. i do not find any merit in the argument advanced. it is well settled that transfer is a normal exigency of service and the courts are not required to interfere with the same until that is in violation of statute or is an outcome of malafides or extraneous considerations or is shockingly arbitrary. no such eventuality exists in the present matter. no other argument is advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. the petition for writ is, therefore, dismissed. (govind mathur) j.rm/-

Full Judgment

1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7367/2012 Bhanwar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. DATE OF ORDER :

6. 8.2012 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J.

Mr. B.L. Choudhary, for the petitioner/s. ... By the order dated 31.5.2012, the Zonal Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur transferred the petitioner from Barmer depot to Jalore depot. While questioning, correctness of the same, it is stated that the petitioner is suffering from certain ailments, but without taking into consideration the same, impugned transfer has been effected. It is also pointed out that a representation was submitted by the petitioner, but the respondents did not consider the same. I do not find any merit in the argument advanced. It is well settled that transfer is a normal exigency of service and the courts are not required to interfere with the same until that is in violation of statute or is an outcome of malafides or extraneous considerations or is shockingly arbitrary. No such eventuality exists in the present matter. No other argument is advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition for writ is, therefore, dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR) J.

rm/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial