Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satyendra Ram Vs. the State of Bihar

Satyendra Ram vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 18, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satyendra Ram

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.36249 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. satyendra ram s/o late ramdas ram r/o vill.- mangal bigha (pranpur), p.s.- amba, distt.- aurangabad, (bihar) .... .... petitioner/s versus 1. the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. krishna prasad singh sr. advocate for the opposite party/s : mr. m.k. gautam, app ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice jyoti saran oral order (per: honourable mr. justice jyoti saran”18. 01-2012 heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state. the petitioner is in custody in connection with amba p.s.case no.14 of 2011 for the offence punishable under section 302/34 of the indian penal code. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has been alleged to have assaulted the husband of the informant but the manner of occurrence finds variance in course of the investigation. be that as it may, the very fact that the informant has categorically alleged this petitioner of having assaulted her patna high court cr.misc. no.36249 of 2011 (3) dt.18-01-2012 2 husband by means of a tangi leading not only to grievous injury on his head but also leaving his scalp fractured, i am not inclined to consider the prayer of the petitioner and the same is rejected. the application is dismissed. ahk (jyoti saran, j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36249 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Satyendra Ram S/O Late Ramdas Ram R/O Vill.- Mangal Bigha (Pranpur), P.S.- Amba, Distt.- Aurangabad, (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN”

18. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Amba P.S.Case No.14 of 2011 for the offence punishable under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has been alleged to have assaulted the husband of the informant but the manner of occurrence finds variance in course of the investigation. Be that as it may, the very fact that the informant has categorically alleged this petitioner of having assaulted her Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36249 of 2011 (3) dt.18-01-2012 2 husband by means of a Tangi leading not only to grievous injury on his head but also leaving his scalp fractured, I am not inclined to consider the prayer of the petitioner and the same is rejected. The application is dismissed. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial