Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kesa Ram Vs. State

Kesa Ram vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Feb 12, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973437

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kesa Ram

Respondent

State

Excerpt

s.b. crl. misc. 3rd bail appln. no. 8142/2012. kesa ram vs. state of rajasthan // 1 // 14 s.b. crl. misc. 3rd bail appln. no. 8142/2012. kesa ram vs. state of rajasthan .. date of order ::12. h february 2013. honble mr. justice dinesh maheshwari mr. n.s. khileri, for the applicant. mr. o.p. singaria, public prosecutor. by the court: after having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor for the state and having perused the material placed on record, this court does not feel persuaded to grant indulgence to the petitioner in this repeat bail plea. however, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, when the petitioner is said to be in custody since the month of july 2007, it is definitely expected of the learned trial court to assign utmost priority to the trial of the case and to bring the same to finality at the earliest. it shall also be expected of the prosecution to produce all its witnesses without delay and to take all steps for conclusion of the matter at the earliest. subject to the observations foregoing, this 3rd bail application under section 439 cr.p.c. moved on behalf of the accused petitioner kesa ram son of punaram @ puranmal stands rejected at this stage. (dinesh maheshwari), j.//mohan//

Full Judgment

S.B. CRL. MISC. 3rd BAIL APPLN. NO. 8142/2012. Kesa Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan // 1 // 14 S.B. CRL. MISC. 3rd BAIL APPLN. NO. 8142/2012. Kesa Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan .. Date of Order ::

12. h February 2013. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. N.S. Khileri, for the applicant. Mr. O.P. Singaria, Public Prosecutor. <<>> BY THE COURT: After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and having perused the material placed on record, this Court does not feel persuaded to grant indulgence to the petitioner in this repeat bail plea. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, when the petitioner is said to be in custody since the month of July 2007, it is definitely expected of the learned Trial Court to assign utmost priority to the trial of the case and to bring the same to finality at the earliest. It shall also be expected of the prosecution to produce all its witnesses without delay and to take all steps for conclusion of the matter at the earliest. Subject to the observations foregoing, this 3rd bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the accused petitioner Kesa Ram son of Punaram @ Puranmal stands rejected at this stage. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J.

//Mohan//

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial