Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt. Gitanjali Vyas Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Smt. Gitanjali Vyas vs State of Raj. and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Dec 15, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973345

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Gitanjali Vyas

Respondent

State of Raj. and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order d.b. civil special appeal no. 1014/2012 smt. gitanjali vyas vs. state of rajasthan & others. date of order :15. 12.2012 hon'ble the acting chief justice mr. narendra kumar jain hon'ble mr. justice r.s. chauhan ms. varsha bissa, for the appellant. learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this special appeal as well as writ petition and also the application under section 5 of the limitation act with liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the definition of dependent defined under rajasthan compassionate appointment of dependents of deceased government servants rules, 1996. prayer is allowed. writ petition as well as special appeal and application under section 5 of the limitation act are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. (r.s. chauhan),j.(narendra kumar jain),actg.c.j.manoj, s.no.5. all corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. manoj narwani junior personal assistant.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 1014/2012 SMT. GITANJALI VYAS VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER :

15. 12.2012 HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. CHAUHAN Ms. Varsha Bissa, for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this special appeal as well as writ petition and also the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act with liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the definition of dependent defined under Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996. Prayer is allowed. Writ petition as well as special appeal and application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. (R.S. CHAUHAN),J.

(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),Actg.C.J.

Manoj, S.No.5. All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. MANOJ NARWANI JUNIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial