Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aman Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Aman Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aman Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....to g.r. no. 4017 of 2012, rejecting the bail application of the juvenile-petitioner, has been dismissed by the learned appellate court below. the petitioner was apprehended on 24.9.2012 along with other co- accused persons and from possession of the petitioner, one country-made pistol and four live cartridges were recovered. the petitioner was declared to be a juvenile and he filed his application for bail, which was rejected by the juvenile justice board holding that release of the petitioner may bring him into association with known criminals, which shall be dangerous for his physical, moral and psychological development. the appeal filed against the said order was also dismissed by learned appellate court below. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, aman kumar, being a juvenile, on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the juvenile justice board, hazaribag, in connection with g.r. no. 4017 of 2012 arising out of patratu p.s. case no. 204 of 2012, with the condition that one of the bailers should be the father of the petitioner and he shall give an undertaking in the court below that he shall keep the juvenile-petitioner under his personal care and protection and no repetition of such offence shall be made by the petitioner. this application is accordingly, allowed. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 477 of 2013 Aman Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 21.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 29th April 2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribag, in Criminal Appeal No. 75 of 2013, whereby the appeal filed against the order dated 20th March 2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Hazaribag, in Patratu P.S. Case no. 204 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4017 of 2012, rejecting the bail application of the juvenile-petitioner, has been dismissed by the learned Appellate Court below. The petitioner was apprehended on 24.9.2012 along with other co- accused persons and from possession of the petitioner, one country-made pistol and four live cartridges were recovered. The petitioner was declared to be a juvenile and he filed his application for bail, which was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board holding that release of the petitioner may bring him into association with known criminals, which shall be dangerous for his physical, moral and psychological development. The appeal filed against the said order was also dismissed by learned Appellate Court below. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Aman Kumar, being a juvenile, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Hazaribag, in connection with G.R. No. 4017 of 2012 arising out of Patratu P.S. Case No. 204 of 2012, with the condition that one of the bailers should be the father of the petitioner and he shall give an undertaking in the Court below that he shall keep the juvenile-petitioner under his personal care and protection and no repetition of such offence shall be made by the petitioner. This application is accordingly, allowed. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial