Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subhash Kumar Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Subhash Kumar vs Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972795

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subhash Kumar

Respondent

Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi wp(c)no.4620of2008 subhashkumar ... petitioner versus jharkhandstateelectricityboardandors.... ... respondents coram: honblemr.justiceapareshkumarsingh forthepetitioner :m/sm.s.mittal,sr.advocate&silpijohn fortherespondents :m/sajitkumar&p.k.deomani 1521.6.2013 bywayofasupplementaryaffidavitthepetitionerhasbrought onrecordtherevisedbillissuedbytheboardinrespectoftheperiod inquestionanditisthesubmissionofthepetitionerthathehaspaid thesaidbillenclosingthereceiptaswelltothesaidsupplementary affidavit. itappearsfromthesubmissionsofthepartiesthatthegrievance ofthepetitionerhasbeenredressed. thiswritpetitionis,accordingly,dismissedasinfructuous. (apareshkumarsingh,j.) pandey

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(C)No.4620of2008 SubhashKumar ... Petitioner Versus JharkhandStateElectricityBoardandors.... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :M/sM.S.Mittal,Sr.Advocate&SilpiJohn FortheRespondents :M/SAjitKumar&P.K.Deomani 1521.6.2013 Bywayofasupplementaryaffidavitthepetitionerhasbrought onrecordtherevisedbillissuedbytheBoardinrespectoftheperiod inquestionanditisthesubmissionofthepetitionerthathehaspaid thesaidbillenclosingthereceiptaswelltothesaidsupplementary affidavit. Itappearsfromthesubmissionsofthepartiesthatthegrievance ofthepetitionerhasbeenredressed. Thiswritpetitionis,accordingly,dismissedasinfructuous. (ApareshKumarSingh,J.) Pandey

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial