Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jitendra Kumar Singh and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Jitendra Kumar Singh and ors vs The State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972792

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitendra Kumar Singh and ors

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi cont.case(civil)no.1069of2012 jitendrakumarsingh&ors. . petitioners versus thestateofjharkhand&another .... oppositeparties coram: honblemr.justiced.n.patel forthepetitioners :mr.a.k.sahani,advocate forthestate :j.c.tog.p.ii 06/dated:21 st june,2013 1. beforelearnedcounselfortheapplicants(originalpetitioners)arguesout thecaseindetail,itisfairlysubmittedbylearnedcounselforthestatethat nowinduecomplianceoftheorderpassedbythiscourtinearlierwritpetition, therespondentshavepassedorderdated18thjune,2013whichisatannexure a/2tothecounteraffidavitfiledbytherespondents.2. inviewoftheorderpassedbytherespondentsdated18th june,2013, thereisnowillfuldisobediencebytherespondentsoftheorderpassedbythis court and, hence, this contempt application is, hereby, dismissed. liberty is reservedwiththeapplicantstochallengetheorderdated18thjune,2013which is at annexurea/2 to the counter affidavit, in accordance with law before appropriateforum. (d.n.patel,j.) ajay

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.1069of2012 JitendraKumarSingh&ors. . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand&another .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioners :Mr.A.K.Sahani,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.P.II 06/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Beforelearnedcounselfortheapplicants(originalpetitioners)arguesout thecaseindetail,itisfairlysubmittedbylearnedcounselfortheStatethat nowinduecomplianceoftheorderpassedbythisCourtinearlierwritpetition, therespondentshavepassedorderdated18thJune,2013whichisatAnnexure A/2tothecounteraffidavitfiledbytherespondents.

2. Inviewoftheorderpassedbytherespondentsdated18th June,2013, thereisnowillfuldisobediencebytherespondentsoftheorderpassedbythis Court and, hence, this contempt application is, hereby, dismissed. Liberty is reservedwiththeapplicantstochallengetheorderdated18thJune,2013which is at AnnexureA/2 to the counter affidavit, in accordance with law before appropriateforum. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial