Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pramila Devi Vs. Manila Verma and anr

Pramila Devi vs Manila Verma and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972741

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramila Devi

Respondent

Manila Verma and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand, ranchi. w.p(c) no.3471 of 2013 parmila devi................................... petitioner versus manilal verma &anr .................. respondents coram :- hon'ble mr. justice p.p.bhatt for the petitioner :- mr v.p.singh sr. adv. mr.a.k.singh advocate. mrs. amrita kumari advocate. 2/21.6.2013. defect as pointed out by the office on 19.6.2013 be ignored as the son of the petitioner has filed an affidavit. the present petitioner by way of filing this writ petition under article 227 of the constitution of india has prayed for quashing the order dated 29.5.2013 passed by the principal district judge, garhwa in misc case appeal no.14/2012 whereby the learned court below has dismissed the said appeal and confirmed the order dated 10.10.2012 passed in misc.case no. 7 of 2012which was filed in execution case no. 3/04 arising out of eviction suit no. 58 of 1988 whereby objection under order 21 rule 97 cpc filed by the petitioner has been held not maintainable. upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned order as well as the materials placed on record let urgent show cause notice be issued to respondents under registered cover with a/d as well as by ordinary process for which requisite etc. must be filed within one week. notice returnable after four weeks put up this case after four weeks. till next date of listing status quo as existing today shall be maintained in respect of the order dated 29.5.2013 passed by the learned principal district judge,garhwa in misc. appeal no.14/201. let this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (p.p.bhatt, j) sd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI. W.P(C) No.3471 of 2013 Parmila Devi................................... Petitioner Versus Manilal Verma &Anr .................. Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner :- Mr V.P.Singh Sr. Adv. Mr.A.K.Singh Advocate. Mrs. Amrita Kumari Advocate. 2/21.6.2013. Defect as pointed out by the office on 19.6.2013 be ignored as the son of the petitioner has filed an affidavit. The present petitioner by way of filing this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing the order dated 29.5.2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Garhwa in Misc Case Appeal No.14/2012 whereby the learned court below has dismissed the said appeal and confirmed the order dated 10.10.2012 passed in Misc.Case No. 7 of 2012which was filed in Execution Case No. 3/04 arising out of eviction suit no. 58 of 1988 whereby objection under order 21 Rule 97 CPC filed by the petitioner has been held not maintainable. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned order as well as the materials placed on record let urgent show cause notice be issued to respondents under registered cover with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisite etc. must be filed within one week. Notice returnable after four weeks Put up this case after four weeks. Till next date of listing status quo as existing today shall be maintained in respect of the order dated 29.5.2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge,Garhwa in Misc. Appeal No.14/201. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (P.P.Bhatt, J) SD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial