Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bebi Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Bebi Devi and anr vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 18, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972633

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bebi Devi and anr

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a. b.a. no. 1961 o”1. bebi devi 2. nirmala devi .........petitioners vs. the state of jharkhand ........opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar for the petitioners: mr. arbind kumar choudhary for the state: mr. prem prakash, app 3/18.06.2013: anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners bebi devi and nirmala devi is moved by sri arbind kumar choudhary and opposed by sri prem prakash, learned additional p.p. so far petitioner no. 2 is concerned, there is direct allegation that she assaulted informant's mother with axe. it appears that due to the said assault, informant's mother received injuries on her head which is grievous in nature. under the said circumstance, i am not inclined to enlarge petitioner no. 2, namely, nirmala devi, on anticipatory bail. accordingly, her anticipatory bail application rejected. so far petitioner no. 1, namely, bebi devi is concerned, there is no specific overt act against her. accordingly, i allow her anticipatory bail application and direct her to surrender in the court below by 28.06.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner no. 1, namely, bebi devi, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, deoghar in connection with mohanpur p.s. case no. 91 of 2013 ( g.r. no. 335 of 2013) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1961 o”

1. Bebi Devi 2. Nirmala Devi .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Arbind Kumar Choudhary For the State: Mr. Prem Prakash, APP 3/18.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Bebi Devi and Nirmala Devi is moved by Sri Arbind Kumar Choudhary and opposed by Sri Prem Prakash, learned Additional P.P. So far petitioner no. 2 is concerned, there is direct allegation that she assaulted informant's mother with Axe. It appears that due to the said assault, informant's mother received injuries on her head which is grievous in nature. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner no. 2, namely, Nirmala Devi, on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, her anticipatory bail application rejected. So far petitioner no. 1, namely, Bebi Devi is concerned, there is no specific overt act against her. Accordingly, I allow her anticipatory bail application and direct her to surrender in the court below by 28.06.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner no. 1, namely, Bebi Devi, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 91 of 2013 ( G.R. No. 335 of 2013) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial