Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Suman Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Suman Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 17, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972573

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suman Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.501of2013 sumankumar petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.prabirkr.chaterjee,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 06/17.06.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. itreveals that twomobilesets have beenstolen from the shop ofthe informantwhilehewasdealingwiththecustomers. duringinvestigationthe calldetailreport,obtainedbythei.o.,indicatedthatoneofthestolenmobileset wasbeingusedbythispetitioner. itissubmittedthatpetitionerhasneverstolenmobilesetinordertouse itatanypointoftime.onthebasisofweakpieceofevidencethepetitionerhas beenimplicatedinthiscase. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. consideringthefactsandcircumstancesaswellasevidenceavailablein thecasediary,abovenamedpetitionerisdirectedtosurrenderbeforethecourt belowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtodayandonsuchsurrenderheis directedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupees tenthousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad in connection with dhanbadp.s.caseno.495of2011correspondingtog.r.caseno.1999of2011 subjecttotheconditionslaiddownundersection438(2)cr.p.c. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.501of2013 SumanKumar Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.PrabirKr.Chaterjee,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 06/17.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Itreveals that twomobilesets have beenstolen from the shop ofthe informantwhilehewasdealingwiththecustomers. Duringinvestigationthe calldetailreport,obtainedbytheI.O.,indicatedthatoneofthestolenmobileset wasbeingusedbythispetitioner. Itissubmittedthatpetitionerhasneverstolenmobilesetinordertouse itatanypointoftime.Onthebasisofweakpieceofevidencethepetitionerhas beenimplicatedinthiscase. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringthefactsandcircumstancesaswellasevidenceavailablein thecasediary,abovenamedpetitionerisdirectedtosurrenderbeforetheCourt belowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtodayandonsuchsurrenderheis directedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(Rupees TenThousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with DhanbadP.S.CaseNo.495of2011correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.1999of2011 subjecttotheconditionslaiddownunderSection438(2)Cr.P.C. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Suman Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales