Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhishek Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand

Abhishek Kumar vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 17, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972525

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhishek Kumar

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 3518 of 2011 abhishek kumar petitioner -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand ... opposite party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar. for the petitioner : - mr. a.k. kashyap, sr. advocate m/s lina shakti, advocate. for the state : - mr. v.s. sahay, a.p.p. 20/17.06.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by abhishek kumar, is moved by sri a.k. kashyap, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri v.s. sahay, learned additional p.p. for the state. it is alleged that the co-accused named in the first information report took money from various students for getting them admitted in kalyani it centre. petitioner is not named in the first information report. in the case diary it has been mentioned that it has come to light, during investigation, that petitioner was treasurer of kalyani it centre, but there is no evidence to substantiate that fact. it appears that petitioner has been implicated in this case merely because he is nephew / son of arun kumar pandey, who is one of the accused named in the first information report. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 27.06.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad, in connection with sindri (goshala) p.s. case no. 67 of 2010 corresponding to g.r. no. 2546 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3518 of 2011 Abhishek Kumar Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate M/s Lina Shakti, Advocate. For the State : - Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. 20/17.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Abhishek Kumar, is moved by Sri A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri V.S. Sahay, learned Additional P.P. for the State. It is alleged that the co-accused named in the first information report took money from various students for getting them admitted in Kalyani IT Centre. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. In the case diary it has been mentioned that it has come to light, during investigation, that petitioner was treasurer of Kalyani IT Centre, but there is no evidence to substantiate that fact. It appears that petitioner has been implicated in this case merely because he is nephew / son of Arun Kumar Pandey, who is one of the accused named in the first information report. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 27.06.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Sindri (Goshala) P.S. Case No. 67 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 2546 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial