Excerpt
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 3518 of 2011 abhishek kumar petitioner -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand ... opposite party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar. for the petitioner : - mr. a.k. kashyap, sr. advocate m/s lina shakti, advocate. for the state : - mr. v.s. sahay, a.p.p. 20/17.06.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by abhishek kumar, is moved by sri a.k. kashyap, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri v.s. sahay, learned additional p.p. for the state. it is alleged that the co-accused named in the first information report took money from various students for getting them admitted in kalyani it centre. petitioner is not named in the first information report. in the case diary it has been mentioned that it has come to light, during investigation, that petitioner was treasurer of kalyani it centre, but there is no evidence to substantiate that fact. it appears that petitioner has been implicated in this case merely because he is nephew / son of arun kumar pandey, who is one of the accused named in the first information report. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 27.06.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad, in connection with sindri (goshala) p.s. case no. 67 of 2010 corresponding to g.r. no. 2546 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/
Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3518 of 2011 Abhishek Kumar Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate M/s Lina Shakti, Advocate. For the State : - Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. 20/17.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Abhishek Kumar, is moved by Sri A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri V.S. Sahay, learned Additional P.P. for the State. It is alleged that the co-accused named in the first information report took money from various students for getting them admitted in Kalyani IT Centre. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. In the case diary it has been mentioned that it has come to light, during investigation, that petitioner was treasurer of Kalyani IT Centre, but there is no evidence to substantiate that fact. It appears that petitioner has been implicated in this case merely because he is nephew / son of Arun Kumar Pandey, who is one of the accused named in the first information report. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 27.06.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Sindri (Goshala) P.S. Case No. 67 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 2546 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/