Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Logen Soren Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Logen Soren vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972475

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Logen Soren

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi cr.appeal(db)no.146of2013 logensoren .......appellant versus thestateofjharkhand .....respondent. coram: honblemr.justiced.n.patel honblemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar. fortheappellant :mr.brijn.kumar,advocate forthestate:mr.raviprakash,a.p.p. 05/dated:19 th june,2013 oralorder: perd.n.patel,j.:1. thisappealhasbeenadmittedvideorderdated14thmay,2013and therecordandproceedingsofsessionstrialno.215of2009wascalled fromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsforsuspensionof sentence.2. thiscourthasreceivedtherecordandproceedingsofthetrialcourt andwehaveperusedthesame.3. havingheardlearnedcounselforboththesidesandlookingtothe evidencesonrecordandalsolookingtothe prosecutionwitnessesfrom p.w.1top.w.8,thereisaprimafaciecaseinfavourofthisappellant.asthe criminalappealispending,wearenotmuchanalyzingtheevidenceson record, but, suffice it to say that the allegations levelled against this appellant is of gang rape in which other accused persons have been acquittedexceptthisappellant.wehavealsoperusedtheevidencegivenby p.w.6,whoisadoctor,namelyshashilal.4. inviewofthesefacts,wehereby,suspendthesentenceawardedby thelearnedtrialcourttothepresentappellant.duringpendencyofthis appeal,theappellantnamely,logensoren,isdirectedtobereleasedon bail upon executing bond of rs.10,000/ (rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned additional sessions judgev, dhanbad, in connection with sessions trial no.215of2009,ontheconditionthattheappellantshallbeavailableas andwhenhispresenceisrequiredbythecourt. (d.n.patel,j) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) vk/

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.146of2013 LogenSoren .......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .....Respondent. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant :Mr.BrijN.Kumar,Advocate FortheState:Mr.RaviPrakash,A.P.P. 05/Dated:19 th June,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:

1. ThisappealhasbeenAdmittedvideorderdated14thMay,2013and therecordandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.215of2009wascalled fromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsforsuspensionof sentence.

2. ThisCourthasreceivedtherecordandproceedingsofthetrialcourt andwehaveperusedthesame.

3. Havingheardlearnedcounselforboththesidesandlookingtothe evidencesonrecordandalsolookingtothe prosecutionwitnessesfrom P.W.1toP.W.8,thereisaprimafaciecaseinfavourofthisappellant.Asthe criminalappealispending,wearenotmuchanalyzingtheevidenceson record, but, suffice it to say that the allegations levelled against this appellant is of gang rape in which other accused persons have been acquittedexceptthisappellant.Wehavealsoperusedtheevidencegivenby P.W.6,whoisaDoctor,namelyShashiLal.

4. Inviewofthesefacts,wehereby,suspendthesentenceawardedby thelearnedtrialcourttothepresentappellant.Duringpendencyofthis appeal,theappellantnamely,LogenSoren,isdirectedtobereleasedon bail upon executing bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions JudgeV, Dhanbad, in connection with Sessions Trial No.215of2009,ontheconditionthattheappellantshallbeavailableas andwhenhispresenceisrequiredbytheCourt. (D.N.Patel,J) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) VK/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial