Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ainul Haque and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Ainul Haque and ors vs State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972459

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ainul Haque and ors

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p.no.1009 of 2012 ainul haque and others ...........................petitioners versus state of jharkhand and another .............. opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioners : md.razaullah ansari for the state : a.p.p 6.19.6.13. i.a.no.3410 of 2013 learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this application has been filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance but while the matter was pending hearing, prayer for discharge of the petitioners has been rejected by the court below, vide order dated 23.5.2013 which has been challenged by way of this interlocutory application and therefore, the prayer made in the interlocutory application be allowed to be incorporated in the main application. the prayer made in the interlocutory application is hereby allowed. let the aforesaid i.a form part of the main application. cr.m.p.no.1009 of 2012 as prayed for, let this matter be listed on 24.6.2013. (r.r. prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1009 of 2012 Ainul Haque and others ...........................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .............. Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Md.Razaullah Ansari For the State : A.P.P 6.19.6.13. I.A.No.3410 of 2013 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this application has been filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance but while the matter was pending hearing, prayer for discharge of the petitioners has been rejected by the court below, vide order dated 23.5.2013 which has been challenged by way of this interlocutory application and therefore, the prayer made in the interlocutory application be allowed to be incorporated in the main application. The prayer made in the interlocutory application is hereby allowed. Let the aforesaid I.A form part of the main application. Cr.M.P.No.1009 of 2012 As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 24.6.2013. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial