Seraj Khan and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Seraj Khan and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972437

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/972437
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jun 19, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Seraj Khan and ors

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.1519of2013 1.serajkhan@serajahmad 2.samshadbegum@samshadbiwi 3.sehrakhatoon 4.arminkhatoon@yarminkhatoon petitioners versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioners :mr.tapasroy,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 02/19.06.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. itrevealsfromthef.i.r.thatthecomplainantwassubjectedtorapeby accusedno.1mahesurrajakhan. whenthisfactcametotheknowledgeof parents of the victim and villagers, a meeting under the aegis of anjuman committee was convened and after that marriage between complainant and accusedmahesurrajakhanwassolemnized. itisallegedthatinformantwas notacceptedbyfamilymembersandshewassubjectedtotortureandtreated withcrueltyforwantofdowry. itissubmittedthatpresentcasehasbeenlodgedonlybecausetheother familymemberswerenothappywiththemarriagewhichwassolemnizedunder somecompulsion createdbyanjumancommittee. otherallegations levelled againstthemarefalseandfabricated.somecoaccusedhavebeengrantedbail bythiscourtvidea.b.a.no.797of2013. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. since other coaccused are enjoying privilege of bail, above named petitionersaredirectedtosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinaperiodof threeweeksfromtodayandonsuchsurrendertheyaredirectedtobereleased onbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand)eachwith twosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthecourtoflearned chiefjudicialmagistrate,gumlainconnectionwithgumlap.s.caseno.208of 2012correspondingtog.r.caseno.632of2012subjecttotheconditionslaid downundersection438(2)cr.p.c. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1519of2013 1.SerajKhan@SerajAhmad 2.SamshadBegum@SamshadBiwi 3.SehraKhatoon 4.ArminKhatoon@YarminKhatoon Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.TapasRoy,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/19.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromtheF.I.R.thatthecomplainantwassubjectedtorapeby accusedno.1MahesurRajaKhan. Whenthisfactcametotheknowledgeof parents of the victim and villagers, a meeting under the aegis of Anjuman Committee was convened and after that marriage between complainant and accusedMahesurRajaKhanwassolemnized. Itisallegedthatinformantwas notacceptedbyfamilymembersandshewassubjectedtotortureandtreated withcrueltyforwantofdowry. Itissubmittedthatpresentcasehasbeenlodgedonlybecausetheother familymemberswerenothappywiththemarriagewhichwassolemnizedunder somecompulsion createdbyAnjumanCommittee. Otherallegations levelled againstthemarefalseandfabricated.Somecoaccusedhavebeengrantedbail bythisCourtvideA.B.A.No.797of2013. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Since other coaccused are enjoying privilege of bail, above named petitionersaredirectedtosurrenderbeforetheCourtbelowwithinaperiodof threeweeksfromtodayandonsuchsurrendertheyaredirectedtobereleased onbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)eachwith twosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCourtoflearned ChiefJudicialMagistrate,GumlainconnectionwithGumlaP.S.CaseNo.208of 2012correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.632of2012subjecttotheconditionslaid downunderSection438(2)Cr.P.C. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Seraj Khan and ors vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education