Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gomia Bibi Vs. State of Jharkhand

Gomia Bibi vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972426

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gomia Bibi

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi i.a. no. 1359 of 2013 in criminal appeal (d.b) no. 159 of 2013 gomia bibi ... ... appellant versus the state of jharkhand ... ... respondent ------- coram : hon'ble mr. justice d.n. patel hon'ble mr. justice shree chandrashekhar ------- for the appellant : mr. shree nivas roy, advocate for the respondent : a.p.p 08/dated 19 h june, 2013 per d.n. patel, j.1. this application has been preferred under section 5 of the limitation act for condonation of delay of 228 days in preferring the criminal appeal.2. having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and reasons stated in this i.a especially, in paragraph nos. 6 and 7, there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. we, therefore, condone the delay in preferring the criminal appeal.3. i.a no. 1359 of 2013 is, therefore, allowed.4. registry is directed to enlist the criminal appeal on the board of admission on 24th june, 2013. (d.n. patel, j.) (shree chandrashekhar, j.) r.k / amit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 1359 of 2013 In Criminal Appeal (D.B) No. 159 of 2013 Gomia Bibi ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ------- For the Appellant : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the Respondent : A.P.P 08/DATED 19 h June, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J.

1. This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 228 days in preferring the criminal appeal.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and reasons stated in this I.A especially, in paragraph nos. 6 and 7, there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. We, therefore, condone the delay in preferring the criminal appeal.

3. I.A No. 1359 of 2013 is, therefore, allowed.

4. Registry is directed to enlist the criminal appeal on the board of Admission on 24th June, 2013. (D.N. Patel, J.) (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) R.K / Amit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial