Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rakesh Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another

Rakesh Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972413

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and Another

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no. 1485 of 2012 rakesh kumar ... ... petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand 2. sunita prasad ... ... ... opposite parties --- coram : hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy for the petitioner : mr. rajan raj, advocate for the state : a. p. p. for the o.p. no.2 : mr. s.k. burnwal, advocate 10/19.06.2013 office by bonafide mistake listed this case under the heading 'for hearing'. put up this case under the heading 'for admission' on 26.06.2013 in court. till then, interim order dated 29.11.2012 shall continue. (jaya roy, j.) satayendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1485 of 2012 Rakesh Kumar ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Sunita Prasad ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. S.K. Burnwal, Advocate 10/19.06.2013 Office by bonafide mistake listed this case under the heading 'for hearing'. Put up this case under the heading 'for admission' on 26.06.2013 in Court. Till then, interim order dated 29.11.2012 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial