Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Durga Marandi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Durga Marandi and ors vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972398

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Durga Marandi and ors

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s) no. 5585 of 2009 durga marandi & ors. ..... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand & ors. . respondents coram: honble mr. justice alok singh for the petitioners : mr. afaque ahmad, advocate for the respondents : mr. ashok kumar, j.c. to g.p.-iii ----- 4 /19.12.2012 i.a. no. 348 of 2010 by way of present interlocutory application, petitioners seek amendment in the writ petition. amendment, as sought for by the petitioners, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. for the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, i.a. no.348 of 2010 is allowed. w.p.(s) no. 5585 of 2009 let necessary correction be made in the memo of parties on or before 5th january, 2013. counter affidavit, to the amended writ petition, may be filed within next six weeks. rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (alok singh, j.) r.k.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5585 of 2009 Durga Marandi & Ors. ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioners : Mr. Afaque Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar, J.C. to G.P.-III ----- 4 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 348 of 2010 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioners seek amendment in the writ petition. Amendment, as sought for by the petitioners, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.348 of 2010 is allowed. W.P.(S) No. 5585 of 2009 Let necessary correction be made in the memo of parties on or before 5th January, 2013. Counter affidavit, to the amended writ petition, may be filed within next six weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial