Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pinki Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Pinki Devi vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972312

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pinki Devi

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no.3743 of 2012 ---- pinki devi .... .... ... ... .... petitioner ---versus--- the state of jharkhand .........opposite party ---- coram: hon'ble mrs.justice jaya roy ---- for the petitioner : mr. awnish shankar, advocate for the state : a.p.p. ---- 3 / 19.12.2012 heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the state. the petitioner is accused in this case registered under sections 414/ 34 of the i.p.c. and section 30(ii) of the coal mines act and section 33 of the indian forest act, pending in the court of c.j.m., hazaribagh. counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner is a lady aged about 30 years and she is pregnant and her expected date is 5.2.2013 and to support her contention she has annexed certain medical prescriptions in supplementary affidavit as annexure -1 series. counsel for the state has opposed but not disputed the aforesaid contentions of the counsel for the petitioner. considering the fact that the petitioner is pregnant at present and she is expecting her date in the month of february, 2013, and considering this aspect, only for granting anticipatory bail, i direct the petitioner above named, to surrender before the trial court /court below within a period of one month from the date of this order. if the petitioner surrenders before the court below/trial court within the said period, the trial court /court below is directed to release the petitioner namely pinki devi on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of c.j.m., hazaribagh, in connection with hazaribagh (sadar) p.s.case no.706 of 2012, corresponding to g.r. no.3625 of 2012, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the district concerned and also subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) cr.p.c. ( jaya roy, j.) si/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3743 of 2012 ---- Pinki Devi .... .... ... ... .... Petitioner ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand .........Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Awnish Shankar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 3 / 19.12.2012 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused in this case registered under Sections 414/ 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, pending in the court of C.J.M., Hazaribagh. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner is a lady aged about 30 years and she is pregnant and her expected date is 5.2.2013 and to support her contention she has annexed certain medical prescriptions in Supplementary Affidavit as Annexure -1 series. Counsel for the State has opposed but not disputed the aforesaid contentions of the counsel for the petitioner. Considering the fact that the petitioner is pregnant at present and she is expecting her date in the month of February, 2013, and considering this aspect, only for granting anticipatory bail, I direct the petitioner above named, to surrender before the trial court /court below within a period of one month from the date of this order. If the petitioner surrenders before the court below/trial court within the said period, the trial court /court below is directed to release the petitioner namely Pinki Devi on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Hazaribagh, in connection with Hazaribagh (Sadar) P.S.Case No.706 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.3625 of 2012, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the district concerned and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Jaya Roy, J.

) SI/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial