Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devendra Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand

Devendra Sahu vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972302

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Sahu

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi i.a.no.1785of2012 in cr.appeal(db)no.1106of2012 devendrasahu appellant versus thestateofjharkhand respondent coram: honblemr.justiced.n.patel hon'blemr.justiceprashantkumar fortheappellant : mr.robinkumar,advocate fortherespondent : a.p .p. 03/dated:19 th december,2012 perd.n.patel,j.: i.a.no.1785of2012 1. thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenpreferredundersection5 of the limitation act for condonation of delay of 28 days in preferring this criminalappeal.2. having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasonsstatedinparagraphs3and5oftheinterlocutoryapplication,itappears that there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. we, therefore, condonethedelayinpreferringthiscriminalappeal.3. accordingly,i.a.no.1785of2012isallowedanddisposedof. cr.appeal(db)no.1106of2012 registryisdirectedtoenlistthiscriminalappealalongwiththepapersof cr.appeal(db)no.965of2012(thisappealhasalreadybeenadmittedbythis court)ontheboardofadmissionon10thjanuary,2013. (d.n.patel,j.) (prashantkumar,j.) ajay/

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.1785of2012 In Cr.Appeal(DB)No.1106of2012 DevendraSahu Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellant : Mr.RobinKumar,Advocate FortheRespondent : A.P .P. 03/Dated:19 th December,2012 PerD.N.Patel,J.: I.A.No.1785of2012 1. ThepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenpreferredunderSection5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 28 days in preferring this criminalappeal.

2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasonsstatedinparagraphs3and5oftheinterlocutoryapplication,itappears that there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. We, therefore, condonethedelayinpreferringthiscriminalappeal.

3. Accordingly,I.A.No.1785of2012isallowedanddisposedof. Cr.Appeal(DB)No.1106of2012 Registryisdirectedtoenlistthiscriminalappealalongwiththepapersof Cr.Appeal(DB)No.965of2012(thisappealhasalreadybeenadmittedbythis Court)ontheboardofAdmissionon10thJanuary,2013. (D.N.Patel,J.) (PrashantKumar,J.) Ajay/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial