Ranjit Kumar Sinha and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Ranjit Kumar Sinha and anr vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Apr 15, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972137

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/972137
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Apr 15, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjit Kumar Sinha and anr

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 4586 of 2012 laxmi sao ... ... petitioner -v e r s u s - the state of jharkhand ... ... opposite party coram: - honble mr. justice d. n. upadhyay for the petitioner : mr. yogesh modi, advocate. for the state: : app. 06/15.04.2013 heard the parties. the petitioner is accused in connection with excise case no. 124/2012 for the offence under section 47-a of excise act, pending in the court of sri a.k. dubey, learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, giridih. it reveals that 450 kgs of jawa mahua and 180 liters of country made liquor and equipments for manufacturing the liquor have been found at the place of occurrence, which was raided by the excise officials. it is submitted that the petitioner is not concerned with the place of seizure. the place of occurrence has not been described in the offence report. it is not possible for a man, aged about 64 years to flee away after seeing the police party. learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail. considering the nature of the offence, i do not feel inclined to give the benefit of section 438(2) cr.p.c to the petitioner. accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner stands dismissed. (d. n. upadhyay, j.) amitesh/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4586 of 2012 Laxmi Sao ... ... Petitioner -V e r s u s - The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate. For the State: : APP. 06/15.04.2013 Heard the parties. The petitioner is accused in connection with Excise Case No. 124/2012 for the offence under Section 47-A of Excise Act, pending in the Court of Sri A.K. Dubey, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. It reveals that 450 Kgs of jawa mahua and 180 liters of country made liquor and equipments for manufacturing the liquor have been found at the place of occurrence, which was raided by the excise officials. It is submitted that the petitioner is not concerned with the place of seizure. The place of occurrence has not been described in the offence report. It is not possible for a man, aged about 64 years to flee away after seeing the police party. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the nature of the offence, I do not feel inclined to give the benefit of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner stands dismissed. (D. N. Upadhyay, J.) Amitesh/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Ranjit Kumar Sinha and anr vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education