Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Madra Oraon Vs. Education

Madra Oraon vs Education

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Apr 15, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972124

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Madra Oraon

Respondent

Education

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.s. no.5318 of 2012 madra oraon ..petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & ors. .respondents ----- coram:honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioner : mr. sunil kumar, advocate for the respondents : mr. ratnakar bhengra, advocate ---- i.a. no. 1972/2013 05/15-04-2013 in this i.a., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of w.p.s. no. 5318 of 2012. it has been stated that petitioner is a retired person and after continuation of provisional pension for some period, the same has been stopped and other pensionary benefits have also not been paid on the ground that his pay was fixed illegally at the higher scale and the petitioner is liable for adjustment of the said amount. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has no other source of subsistence and he is facing acute hardship. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not disputed the said contention and has not opposed the application . considering the grounds mentioned in the application, this i.a. is allowed. office is directed to list w.p.s. no. 5318 of 2012 under the heading "for admission" on 19th june,2013. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No.5318 of 2012 Madra Oraon ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ratnakar Bhengra, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 1972/2013 05/15-04-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.S. No. 5318 of 2012. It has been stated that petitioner is a retired person and after continuation of provisional pension for some period, the same has been stopped and other pensionary benefits have also not been paid on the ground that his pay was fixed illegally at the higher scale and the petitioner is liable for adjustment of the said amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has no other source of subsistence and he is facing acute hardship. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not disputed the said contention and has not opposed the application . Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list W.P.S. No. 5318 of 2012 under the heading "For Admission" on 19th June,2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial