Excerpt
.....to sue all the respondents individually, permission, as sought for, is allowed. the petitioners, as prayed for, are further allowed two weeks' time to take steps for notice on the said respondents by annexing the list in the advertisement, which is enclosed with the supplementary affidavit informing them that they are being sued through the respondent nos. 15 to 19. for that purpose, the petitioners shall file draft in the proper format of issuing notice on respondents in representative capacity through respondent nos. 15 to 19, in the office. on receipt thereof, the office shall fix a date and put the seal of this court and return the draft to the petitioners for getting the same published in two local daily newspapers, one in english and another in hindi, which have wide circulation in the locality, where the respondents, who are sought to be represented through respondent nos. 15 to 19, normally reside and expected to reside. on publication of notice, the petitioners shall file an affidavit annexing the paper cuttings of the notice in order to establish -2- compliance of the order of this court. i.a. no. 1149/2013 stands disposed of. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/
Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No.1718 of 2012 Rakesh Kumar Singh & Others ........Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Alok Anand, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. ---- I.A. No. 1149/2013 11/15-04-2013 In this I.A., the petitioners have prayed for leave of this Court to implead the persons, whose names are given in the list enclosed in the supplementary affidavit, to be impleaded as respondents in representative capacity through respondent nos. 15 to 19. It has been submitted that all those respondents have same interest and they have been appointed in the same process and in view of the numbers of respondents, it will not be convenient to sue all the persons in individual capacity. Learned J.C. to to A.G. has not disputed the said fact and contention and has no objection in granting the leave, as sought for. Considering that there are numerous persons having same interest and according to the petitioners it is not convenient for them to sue all the respondents individually, permission, as sought for, is allowed. The petitioners, as prayed for, are further allowed two weeks' time to take steps for notice on the said respondents by annexing the list in the advertisement, which is enclosed with the supplementary affidavit informing them that they are being sued through the respondent nos. 15 to 19. For that purpose, the petitioners shall file draft in the proper format of issuing notice on respondents in representative capacity through respondent nos. 15 to 19, in the office. On receipt thereof, the office shall fix a date and put the seal of this Court and return the draft to the petitioners for getting the same published in two local daily newspapers, one in English and another in Hindi, which have wide circulation in the locality, where the respondents, who are sought to be represented through respondent nos. 15 to 19, normally reside and expected to reside. On publication of notice, the petitioners shall file an affidavit annexing the paper cuttings of the notice in order to establish -2- compliance of the order of this Court. I.A. No. 1149/2013 stands disposed of. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/