Vijay Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Vijay Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972039

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/972039
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Sep 17, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijay Kumar

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr.

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.1754of2012 vijaykumar. ... ... ... ... ... ...petitioner versus 1. the state of jharkhand.2. ravi shankar gupta. ... ... ... ... ... ...opp. parties coram: thehonblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay. forthepetitioner: mr.rahulkumar,advocate. forthestate: a.p .p. 06/17.09.2012 it is alleged in the complaint that the petitioner realized rs. 40,000/ from the complainant on the pretext to correct and reduce the bill amount. it is submitted that due to nonpayment, the electric supply was disconnectedwithinthepremisesofcomplainanton28.02.2009andnoticefor recovery was served. thereafter present petition has been filed with false allegation. learned counsel appearing for the complainant has vehemently opposedtheprayer. considering the facts and circumstances appearing from the complaint and the documents placed before me, the petitioner is directed to surrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtodayandifhedoes so he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/ ( ten thousand)withtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthecivil judge,juniordivisionv,garhwainconnectionwithcomplaintcaseno.249of 2011,subjecttotheconditionsaslaiddownundersection438(2)ofthecodeof criminalprocedure. [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1754of2012 VijayKumar. ... ... ... ... ... ...Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. Ravi Shankar Gupta. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Parties CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.RahulKumar,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 06/17.09.2012 It is alleged in the complaint that the petitioner realized Rs. 40,000/ from the complainant on the pretext to correct and reduce the bill amount. It is submitted that due to nonpayment, the electric supply was disconnectedwithinthepremisesofcomplainanton28.02.2009andnoticefor recovery was served. Thereafter present petition has been filed with false allegation. Learned Counsel appearing for the complainant has vehemently opposedtheprayer. Considering the facts and circumstances appearing from the complaint and the documents placed before me, the petitioner is directed to surrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinthreeweeksfromtodayandifhedoes so he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ ( Ten thousand)withtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCivil Judge,JuniorDivisionV,GarhwainconnectionwithComplaintCaseNo.249of 2011,subjecttotheconditionsaslaiddownunderSection438(2)oftheCodeof CriminalProcedure. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2012 Same Parties Vijay Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and anr. Same Subject Education