Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Martam Korah Vs. State of Jharkhand

Martam Korah vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972021

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Martam Korah

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 3668 of 2012 martam korah ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand .. opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. m.k.dey, sr. advocate & mr. a.k.dey, advocate for the state : mr. v.k.gupta, a.p.p. ------ 6/ 17.09.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. the petitioner has been made accused for the offences under sections 341, 323, 307, 302, 34 of the indian penal code, in connection with goilkera p.s. case no. 37 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 352 of 2011. there is direct allegation against the petitioner and other co- accused persons to have assaulted the deceased causing his death. in the facts of the case, i am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, martam korah, on bail. accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3668 of 2012 Martam Korah ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. M.K.Dey, Sr. Advocate & Mr. A.K.Dey, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.K.Gupta, A.P.P. ------ 6/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Goilkera P.S. Case No. 37 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 352 of 2011. There is direct allegation against the petitioner and other co- accused persons to have assaulted the deceased causing his death. In the facts of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Martam Korah, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial