Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Paras Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Paras Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972015

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Paras Kumar

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p.no.1038 of 2011 paras kumar ............................petitioner versus state of jharkhand and another..opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner: mr.jitendra s.singh for the state :.a.p.p 2.17.9.12. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on 8.1.2002, the petitioner has been alleged to have committed offence under sections 33 and 42 of the indian forest act but the case was lodged on 10.1.2005, upon which cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 33 and 42 of the indian forest act was taken on 7.2.2005 and thereby the order taking cognizance is hit by section 468 of the code of criminal procedure. let notice be issued to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, be not disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice under registered cover with a/d must be filed within one week. let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. meanwhile, counter affidavit be filed on behalf of the state. until further order, further proceeding of d.p.c no.118, gocr-08/05 corresponding to t.r.no.145 of 2008, pending in the court of sub- divisional judicial magistrate, madhupur at deoghar shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (r.r.prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1038 of 2011 Paras Kumar ............................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Jitendra S.Singh For the State :.A.P.P 2.17.9.12. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on 8.1.2002, the petitioner has been alleged to have committed offence under Sections 33 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act but the case was lodged on 10.1.2005, upon which cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act was taken on 7.2.2005 and thereby the order taking cognizance is hit by Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let notice be issued to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, be not disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice under registered cover with A/D must be filed within one week. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Meanwhile, counter affidavit be filed on behalf of the State. Until further order, further proceeding of D.P.C no.118, GOCR-08/05 corresponding to T.R.No.145 of 2008, pending in the court of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur at Deoghar shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial