Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radho Paswan Vs. State of Jharkhand

Radho Paswan vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971982

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radho Paswan

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a no.5820 of 2012 ------ gunjan kumar goyal @ gunjan kumar . petitioner -versus- the state of jharkhand ..... opposite party ------ coram : the honble mr. justice h.c.mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr.nilesh kumar, advocate. for the state : a.p.p. ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the state. the petitioner has been made accused in lohardaga p.s case no.136 of 2010 corresponding to g.r case no.470 of 2010 for the offence under sections 376(2)(g) of the indian penal code. there is direct allegation against the petitioner to have committed gang rape upon the victim. in the facts of this case, i am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, gunjan kumar goyal @ gunjan kumar is hereby rejected. (h.c.mishra, j.) b.s/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5820 of 2012 ------ Gunjan Kumar Goyal @ Gunjan Kumar . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Nilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Lohardaga P.S Case No.136 of 2010 corresponding to G.R Case No.470 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have committed gang rape upon the victim. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, Gunjan Kumar Goyal @ Gunjan Kumar is hereby rejected. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial